Congo vs El Salvador: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Congo
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 267.8% against 254.7% in Congo, a difference of 13.1%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was El Salvador ahead.
Congo ranks 64th and El Salvador ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.3% | 83.2% | 57.9% | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 75.0% | 160.1% | 85.1% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 134.3% | 172.2% | 37.9% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 228.7% | 219.4% | 9.4% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Congo or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 267.8% against 254.7% in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Congo and El Salvador?
- 13.1%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and El Salvador?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Congo and El Salvador rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Congo ranks 64th and El Salvador ranks 61st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.