Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
-26.5%
in 2024
Kiribati
377.2%
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
43rd
Kiribati rank
42nd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Kiribati
0100200300400199120072024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 377.2% against -26.5% in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 403.7%.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 14.2 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 43rd and Kiribati ranks 42nd of 47 groups.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s -30.0% 12.1% 42.1% Kiribati
2000s -33.6% 206.6% 240.2% Kiribati
2010s -27.2% 286.8% 313.9% Kiribati
2020s -26.4% 361.9% 388.3% Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 377.2% against -26.5% in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Kiribati?
403.7%, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Kiribati?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Kiribati rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 43rd and Kiribati ranks 42nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-percent-change-from-1990/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-percent-change-from-1990/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/kiribati/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)
Unit
% change from 1990
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
248 places, 8,432 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.