Australia vs Central African Republic: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

Australia
4.36 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Central African Republic
5.63 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Australia rank
62nd
Central African Republic rank
59th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • Australia
  • Central African Republic
020406080100200020112023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 5.63 Mt CO2e against 4.36 Mt CO2e in Australia, a difference of 1.27 Mt CO2e.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 62nd and Central African Republic ranks 59th of 183 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central African Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 76.65 Mt CO2e 6.82 Mt CO2e 69.83 Mt CO2e Australia
2010s 39.91 Mt CO2e 6.06 Mt CO2e 33.85 Mt CO2e Australia
2020s 15.73 Mt CO2e 5.63 Mt CO2e 10.09 Mt CO2e Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Australia or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 5.63 Mt CO2e against 4.36 Mt CO2e in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Australia and Central African Republic?
1.27 Mt CO2e, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central African Republic?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and Central African Republic rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
Australia ranks 62nd and Central African Republic ranks 59th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central African Republic: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/australia/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/australia/central-african-republic/">Australia vs Central African Republic: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".