Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

Belarus
3.65 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
3.38 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Belarus rank
64th
Equatorial Guinea rank
67th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • Belarus
  • Equatorial Guinea
01234200020112023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 3.65 Mt CO2e against 3.38 Mt CO2e in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.27 Mt CO2e.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Belarus ranks 64th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 2.17 Mt CO2e 3.38 Mt CO2e 1.21 Mt CO2e Equatorial Guinea
2010s 2.53 Mt CO2e 3.38 Mt CO2e 0.8442 Mt CO2e Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3.39 Mt CO2e 3.38 Mt CO2e 0.0092 Mt CO2e Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Belarus or Equatorial Guinea?
Belarus, at 3.65 Mt CO2e against 3.38 Mt CO2e in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
0.27 Mt CO2e, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
Belarus ranks 64th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/belarus/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/belarus/equatorial-guinea/">Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".