Congo vs Uruguay: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation
Congo
2.95 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Uruguay
3.34 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Congo rank
70th
Uruguay rank
68th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time
- Congo
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 3.34 Mt CO2e against 2.95 Mt CO2e in Congo, a difference of 0.39 Mt CO2e.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 183 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.95 Mt CO2e | 0.9639 Mt CO2e | 1.98 Mt CO2e | Congo |
| 2010s | 3 Mt CO2e | 0.9639 Mt CO2e | 2.04 Mt CO2e | Congo |
| 2020s | 3.01 Mt CO2e | 2.32 Mt CO2e | 0.6986 Mt CO2e | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Congo or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 3.34 Mt CO2e against 2.95 Mt CO2e in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Congo and Uruguay?
- 0.39 Mt CO2e, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Uruguay rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
- Congo ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".