Costa Rica vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation
Costa Rica
1.61 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Sweden
1.63 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
80th
Sweden rank
79th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time
- Costa Rica
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1.63 Mt CO2e against 1.61 Mt CO2e in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.02 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 80th and Sweden ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.75 Mt CO2e | 1.6 Mt CO2e | 10.15 Mt CO2e | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 4.84 Mt CO2e | 2.18 Mt CO2e | 2.66 Mt CO2e | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 1.61 Mt CO2e | 1.42 Mt CO2e | 0.1886 Mt CO2e | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Costa Rica or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1.63 Mt CO2e against 1.61 Mt CO2e in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Costa Rica and Sweden?
- 0.02 Mt CO2e, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Sweden rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
- Costa Rica ranks 80th and Sweden ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".