East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
242.41 Mt CO2e
in 2023
South Sudan
28.1 Mt CO2e
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
27th
South Sudan rank
26th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • South Sudan
0200400600200020112023

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 242.41 Mt CO2e against 28.1 Mt CO2e in South Sudan, a difference of 214.31 Mt CO2e.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 8.6 times South Sudan's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 27th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 47 groups.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 370.72 Mt CO2e 28.1 Mt CO2e 342.62 Mt CO2e East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 470.35 Mt CO2e 28.1 Mt CO2e 442.25 Mt CO2e East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2020s 277.34 Mt CO2e 28.1 Mt CO2e 249.24 Mt CO2e East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or South Sudan?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 242.41 Mt CO2e against 28.1 Mt CO2e in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan?
214.31 Mt CO2e, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 27th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/south-sudan/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".