Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation
Ecuador
36.6 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
37.96 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Ecuador rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
16th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 37.96 Mt CO2e against 36.6 Mt CO2e in Ecuador, a difference of 1.36 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.27 Mt CO2e | 37.96 Mt CO2e | 6.31 Mt CO2e | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 35.95 Mt CO2e | 37.96 Mt CO2e | 2.01 Mt CO2e | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 36.39 Mt CO2e | 37.96 Mt CO2e | 1.57 Mt CO2e | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 37.96 Mt CO2e against 36.6 Mt CO2e in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 1.36 Mt CO2e, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
- Ecuador ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".