El Salvador vs New Zealand: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

El Salvador
1.37 Mt CO2e
in 2023
New Zealand
1.84 Mt CO2e
in 2023
El Salvador rank
81st
New Zealand rank
78th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • El Salvador
  • New Zealand
05101520200020112023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.84 Mt CO2e against 1.37 Mt CO2e in El Salvador, a difference of 0.47 Mt CO2e.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 81st and New Zealand ranks 78th of 183 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 2.26 Mt CO2e 6.87 Mt CO2e 4.62 Mt CO2e New Zealand
2010s 1.46 Mt CO2e 6.08 Mt CO2e 4.62 Mt CO2e New Zealand
2020s 1.37 Mt CO2e 3.16 Mt CO2e 1.79 Mt CO2e New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, El Salvador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.84 Mt CO2e against 1.37 Mt CO2e in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between El Salvador and New Zealand?
0.47 Mt CO2e, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and New Zealand rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
El Salvador ranks 81st and New Zealand ranks 78th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs New Zealand: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/el-salvador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/el-salvador/new-zealand/">El Salvador vs New Zealand: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".