Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

Eswatini
0.403 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.3486 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Eswatini rank
97th
Solomon Islands rank
100th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • Eswatini
  • Solomon Islands
0.20.40.6200020112023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.403 Mt CO2e against 0.3486 Mt CO2e in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0544 Mt CO2e.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 97th and Solomon Islands ranks 100th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4514 Mt CO2e 0.5059 Mt CO2e 0.0545 Mt CO2e Solomon Islands
2010s 0.403 Mt CO2e 0.4223 Mt CO2e 0.0193 Mt CO2e Solomon Islands
2020s 0.403 Mt CO2e 0.3486 Mt CO2e 0.0544 Mt CO2e Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Eswatini or Solomon Islands?
Eswatini, at 0.403 Mt CO2e against 0.3486 Mt CO2e in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Eswatini and Solomon Islands?
0.0544 Mt CO2e, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Solomon Islands?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Solomon Islands rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
Eswatini ranks 97th and Solomon Islands ranks 100th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/eswatini/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/eswatini/solomon-islands/">Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".