Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1,179 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
37.96 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
14th
Zimbabwe rank
16th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k200020112023

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 1,179 Mt CO2e against 37.96 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,141 Mt CO2e.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 31.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 45 groups.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 1,081 Mt CO2e 37.96 Mt CO2e 1,043 Mt CO2e Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 1,320 Mt CO2e 37.96 Mt CO2e 1,282 Mt CO2e Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 1,184 Mt CO2e 37.96 Mt CO2e 1,146 Mt CO2e Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Zimbabwe?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 1,179 Mt CO2e against 37.96 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Zimbabwe?
1,141 Mt CO2e, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/zimbabwe/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".