IBRD only vs United States: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

IBRD only
1,706 Mt CO2e
in 2023
United States
124.7 Mt CO2e
in 2023
IBRD only rank
5th
United States rank
5th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • IBRD only
  • United States
01.0k2.0k3.0k200020112023

How they compare

IBRD only currently reports 1,706 Mt CO2e against 124.7 Mt CO2e in United States, a difference of 1,581 Mt CO2e.

That makes IBRD only's figure about 13.7 times United States's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 5th and United States ranks 5th of 45 groups.

IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only United States Difference Ahead
2000s 2,383 Mt CO2e 121.72 Mt CO2e 2,261 Mt CO2e IBRD only
2010s 1,533 Mt CO2e 123.94 Mt CO2e 1,409 Mt CO2e IBRD only
2020s 1,740 Mt CO2e 124.71 Mt CO2e 1,616 Mt CO2e IBRD only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, IBRD only or United States?
IBRD only, at 1,706 Mt CO2e against 124.7 Mt CO2e in United States as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between IBRD only and United States?
1,581 Mt CO2e, with IBRD only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and United States?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and United States rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
IBRD only ranks 5th and United States ranks 5th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs United States: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/ibrd-only/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/ibrd-only/united-states/">IBRD only vs United States: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".