Least developed countries vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

Least developed countries
1,178 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
37.96 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
15th
Zimbabwe rank
16th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k200020112023

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 1,178 Mt CO2e against 37.96 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,140 Mt CO2e.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 31.0 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 45 groups.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 1,014 Mt CO2e 37.96 Mt CO2e 976.21 Mt CO2e Least developed countries
2010s 1,325 Mt CO2e 37.96 Mt CO2e 1,287 Mt CO2e Least developed countries
2020s 1,180 Mt CO2e 37.96 Mt CO2e 1,142 Mt CO2e Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Least developed countries or Zimbabwe?
Least developed countries, at 1,178 Mt CO2e against 37.96 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Least developed countries and Zimbabwe?
1,140 Mt CO2e, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
Least developed countries ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/least-developed-countries-un-classification/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/least-developed-countries-un-classification/zimbabwe/">Least developed countries vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".