Malawi vs Norway: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation
Malawi
2.06 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Norway
2.06 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Malawi rank
75th
Norway rank
76th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time
- Malawi
- Norway
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 2.06 Mt CO2e against 2.06 Mt CO2e in Norway, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Malawi ranks 75th and Norway ranks 76th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.06 Mt CO2e | 1.88 Mt CO2e | 0.1864 Mt CO2e | Malawi |
| 2010s | 2.06 Mt CO2e | 2.23 Mt CO2e | 0.1672 Mt CO2e | Norway |
| 2020s | 2.06 Mt CO2e | 2.08 Mt CO2e | 0.0192 Mt CO2e | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Malawi or Norway?
- Malawi, at 2.06 Mt CO2e against 2.06 Mt CO2e in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Malawi and Norway?
- 0 Mt CO2e, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Norway rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
- Malawi ranks 75th and Norway ranks 76th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".