OECD members vs South Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation

OECD members
242.57 Mt CO2e
in 2023
South Sudan
28.1 Mt CO2e
in 2023
OECD members rank
26th
South Sudan rank
26th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time

  • OECD members
  • South Sudan
0100200300200020112023

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 242.57 Mt CO2e against 28.1 Mt CO2e in South Sudan, a difference of 214.47 Mt CO2e.

That makes OECD members's figure about 8.6 times South Sudan's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, OECD members has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 26th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 45 groups.

OECD members has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 321.02 Mt CO2e 28.1 Mt CO2e 292.91 Mt CO2e OECD members
2010s 285.74 Mt CO2e 28.1 Mt CO2e 257.64 Mt CO2e OECD members
2020s 249.32 Mt CO2e 28.1 Mt CO2e 221.22 Mt CO2e OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, OECD members or South Sudan?
OECD members, at 242.57 Mt CO2e against 28.1 Mt CO2e in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between OECD members and South Sudan?
214.47 Mt CO2e, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and South Sudan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do OECD members and South Sudan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
OECD members ranks 26th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs South Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/oecd-members/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-deforestation-mt-co2e/oecd-members/south-sudan/">OECD members vs South Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,498 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".