Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1,367 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
37.96 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
13th
Zimbabwe rank
16th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 1,367 Mt CO2e against 37.96 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,329 Mt CO2e.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 36.0 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 47 groups.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,216 Mt CO2e | 37.96 Mt CO2e | 1,178 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 1,481 Mt CO2e | 37.96 Mt CO2e | 1,443 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 1,369 Mt CO2e | 37.96 Mt CO2e | 1,332 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 1,367 Mt CO2e against 37.96 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
- 1,329 Mt CO2e, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - deforestation?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Deforestation".