Armenia vs Iceland: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Armenia
-0.5304 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Iceland
-0.5645 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Armenia rank
51st
Iceland rank
53rd
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Armenia
- Iceland
How they compare
Armenia currently reports -0.5304 Mt CO2e against -0.5645 Mt CO2e in Iceland, a difference of 0.0341 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Armenia ranks 51st and Iceland ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.424 Mt CO2e | -0.1696 Mt CO2e | 0.2543 Mt CO2e | Iceland |
| 2010s | -0.5401 Mt CO2e | -0.4125 Mt CO2e | 0.1276 Mt CO2e | Iceland |
| 2020s | -0.5304 Mt CO2e | -0.5349 Mt CO2e | 0.0045 Mt CO2e | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Armenia or Iceland?
- Armenia, at -0.5304 Mt CO2e against -0.5645 Mt CO2e in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Armenia and Iceland?
- 0.0341 Mt CO2e, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Iceland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Iceland rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Armenia ranks 51st and Iceland ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".