Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land

Barbados
-0.047 Mt CO2e
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
-1,798 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Barbados rank
35th
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
37th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time

  • Barbados
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
-2.0k-1.5k-1.0k-5000200020112023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports -0.047 Mt CO2e against -1,798 Mt CO2e in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 1,798 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 35th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 183 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s -0.0423 Mt CO2e -1,501 Mt CO2e 1,501 Mt CO2e Barbados
2010s -0.047 Mt CO2e -1,694 Mt CO2e 1,694 Mt CO2e Barbados
2020s -0.047 Mt CO2e -1,798 Mt CO2e 1,798 Mt CO2e Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Barbados or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
Barbados, at -0.047 Mt CO2e against -1,798 Mt CO2e in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
1,798 Mt CO2e, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
Barbados ranks 35th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-forest-land-mt-co2e/barbados/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-forest-land-mt-co2e/barbados/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/">Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,518 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".