Belarus vs Chile: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Belarus
-55.21 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Chile
-53.85 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Belarus rank
161st
Chile rank
158th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Belarus
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports -53.85 Mt CO2e against -55.21 Mt CO2e in Belarus, a difference of 1.36 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 161st and Chile ranks 158th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -51.16 Mt CO2e | -67.07 Mt CO2e | 15.91 Mt CO2e | Belarus |
| 2010s | -54.49 Mt CO2e | -51.32 Mt CO2e | 3.17 Mt CO2e | Chile |
| 2020s | -51.61 Mt CO2e | -54.33 Mt CO2e | 2.72 Mt CO2e | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Belarus or Chile?
- Chile, at -53.85 Mt CO2e against -55.21 Mt CO2e in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Belarus and Chile?
- 1.36 Mt CO2e, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Belarus ranks 161st and Chile ranks 158th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".