Belarus vs Zambia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Belarus
-55.21 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zambia
-65.37 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Belarus rank
161st
Zambia rank
164th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Belarus
- Zambia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -55.21 Mt CO2e against -65.37 Mt CO2e in Zambia, a difference of 10.16 Mt CO2e.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 161st and Zambia ranks 164th of 183 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -51.16 Mt CO2e | -76.55 Mt CO2e | 25.39 Mt CO2e | Belarus |
| 2010s | -54.49 Mt CO2e | -67.21 Mt CO2e | 12.72 Mt CO2e | Belarus |
| 2020s | -51.61 Mt CO2e | -65.37 Mt CO2e | 13.76 Mt CO2e | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Belarus or Zambia?
- Belarus, at -55.21 Mt CO2e against -65.37 Mt CO2e in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Belarus and Zambia?
- 10.16 Mt CO2e, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zambia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Zambia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Belarus ranks 161st and Zambia ranks 164th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".