Botswana vs Ecuador: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Botswana
-18.02 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Ecuador
-17.01 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Botswana rank
131st
Ecuador rank
130th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Botswana
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -17.01 Mt CO2e against -18.02 Mt CO2e in Botswana, a difference of 1.01 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.
Botswana ranks 131st and Ecuador ranks 130th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -18.02 Mt CO2e | -10.96 Mt CO2e | 7.06 Mt CO2e | Ecuador |
| 2010s | -18.02 Mt CO2e | -18.62 Mt CO2e | 0.6047 Mt CO2e | Botswana |
| 2020s | -18.02 Mt CO2e | -18.34 Mt CO2e | 0.3214 Mt CO2e | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Botswana or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at -17.01 Mt CO2e against -18.02 Mt CO2e in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Botswana and Ecuador?
- 1.01 Mt CO2e, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Botswana ranks 131st and Ecuador ranks 130th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".