Botswana vs Kazakhstan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Botswana
-18.02 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Kazakhstan
-16.03 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Botswana rank
131st
Kazakhstan rank
128th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Botswana
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports -16.03 Mt CO2e against -18.02 Mt CO2e in Botswana, a difference of 1.99 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Botswana ranks 131st and Kazakhstan ranks 128th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -18.02 Mt CO2e | -11.25 Mt CO2e | 6.77 Mt CO2e | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | -18.02 Mt CO2e | -18.7 Mt CO2e | 0.6796 Mt CO2e | Botswana |
| 2020s | -18.02 Mt CO2e | -18.53 Mt CO2e | 0.5106 Mt CO2e | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Botswana or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at -16.03 Mt CO2e against -18.02 Mt CO2e in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Botswana and Kazakhstan?
- 1.99 Mt CO2e, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kazakhstan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Kazakhstan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Botswana ranks 131st and Kazakhstan ranks 128th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".