Cameroon vs Namibia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Cameroon
-86.91 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Namibia
-122.33 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Cameroon rank
168th
Namibia rank
170th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Cameroon
- Namibia
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports -86.91 Mt CO2e against -122.33 Mt CO2e in Namibia, a difference of 35.42 Mt CO2e.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 168th and Namibia ranks 170th of 184 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -86.91 Mt CO2e | -110.92 Mt CO2e | 24.01 Mt CO2e | Cameroon |
| 2010s | -86.91 Mt CO2e | -119.15 Mt CO2e | 32.25 Mt CO2e | Cameroon |
| 2020s | -86.91 Mt CO2e | -121.02 Mt CO2e | 34.11 Mt CO2e | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Cameroon or Namibia?
- Cameroon, at -86.91 Mt CO2e against -122.33 Mt CO2e in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Cameroon and Namibia?
- 35.42 Mt CO2e, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Namibia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Cameroon ranks 168th and Namibia ranks 170th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".