Costa Rica vs Denmark: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Costa Rica
-4.28 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Denmark
-4.22 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
97th
Denmark rank
96th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Costa Rica
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports -4.22 Mt CO2e against -4.28 Mt CO2e in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.06 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Denmark ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 97th and Denmark ranks 96th of 183 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -2.71 Mt CO2e | -1.55 Mt CO2e | 1.15 Mt CO2e | Denmark |
| 2010s | -4.05 Mt CO2e | -3.32 Mt CO2e | 0.7252 Mt CO2e | Denmark |
| 2020s | -4.28 Mt CO2e | -3.37 Mt CO2e | 0.9155 Mt CO2e | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Costa Rica or Denmark?
- Denmark, at -4.22 Mt CO2e against -4.28 Mt CO2e in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Costa Rica and Denmark?
- 0.06 Mt CO2e, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Denmark?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Denmark rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Costa Rica ranks 97th and Denmark ranks 96th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".