Cuba vs South Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Cuba
-27.77 Mt CO2e
in 2023
South Sudan
-25.34 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Cuba rank
145th
South Sudan rank
143rd
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Cuba
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports -25.34 Mt CO2e against -27.77 Mt CO2e in Cuba, a difference of 2.43 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 145th and South Sudan ranks 143rd of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -19.69 Mt CO2e | -25.34 Mt CO2e | 5.65 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2010s | -25.72 Mt CO2e | -25.34 Mt CO2e | 0.3766 Mt CO2e | South Sudan |
| 2020s | -28.12 Mt CO2e | -25.34 Mt CO2e | 2.78 Mt CO2e | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Cuba or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at -25.34 Mt CO2e against -27.77 Mt CO2e in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Cuba and South Sudan?
- 2.43 Mt CO2e, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Sudan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and South Sudan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Cuba ranks 145th and South Sudan ranks 143rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".