Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Cuba
-27.77 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-28.05 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Cuba rank
145th
Zimbabwe rank
146th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -27.77 Mt CO2e against -28.05 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.28 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -19.69 Mt CO2e | -34.8 Mt CO2e | 15.11 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2010s | -25.72 Mt CO2e | -28.05 Mt CO2e | 2.34 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2020s | -28.12 Mt CO2e | -28.05 Mt CO2e | 0.065 Mt CO2e | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Cuba, at -27.77 Mt CO2e against -28.05 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 0.28 Mt CO2e, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Cuba ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".