Ecuador vs Nepal: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Ecuador
-17.01 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Nepal
-16.23 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Ecuador rank
130th
Nepal rank
129th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Ecuador
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -16.23 Mt CO2e against -17.01 Mt CO2e in Ecuador, a difference of 0.78 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 129th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -10.96 Mt CO2e | -16.23 Mt CO2e | 5.27 Mt CO2e | Ecuador |
| 2010s | -18.62 Mt CO2e | -16.23 Mt CO2e | 2.39 Mt CO2e | Nepal |
| 2020s | -18.34 Mt CO2e | -16.23 Mt CO2e | 2.11 Mt CO2e | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Ecuador or Nepal?
- Nepal, at -16.23 Mt CO2e against -17.01 Mt CO2e in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Ecuador and Nepal?
- 0.78 Mt CO2e, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Ecuador ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 129th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".