Estonia vs Iceland: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Estonia
-0.5717 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Iceland
-0.5645 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Estonia rank
54th
Iceland rank
53rd
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Estonia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -0.5645 Mt CO2e against -0.5717 Mt CO2e in Estonia, a difference of 0.0072 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Estonia ranks 54th and Iceland ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -4.31 Mt CO2e | -0.1696 Mt CO2e | 4.14 Mt CO2e | Iceland |
| 2010s | -1.7 Mt CO2e | -0.4125 Mt CO2e | 1.29 Mt CO2e | Iceland |
| 2020s | -1.4 Mt CO2e | -0.5349 Mt CO2e | 0.8675 Mt CO2e | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Estonia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at -0.5645 Mt CO2e against -0.5717 Mt CO2e in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Estonia and Iceland?
- 0.0072 Mt CO2e, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Iceland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Iceland rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Estonia ranks 54th and Iceland ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".