Ireland vs Serbia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Ireland
-4.49 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Serbia
-4.74 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Ireland rank
100th
Serbia rank
101st
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Ireland
- Serbia
How they compare
Ireland currently reports -4.49 Mt CO2e against -4.74 Mt CO2e in Serbia, a difference of 0.25 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 100th and Serbia ranks 101st of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -4.29 Mt CO2e | -6.63 Mt CO2e | 2.34 Mt CO2e | Ireland |
| 2010s | -6.21 Mt CO2e | -5.52 Mt CO2e | 0.6882 Mt CO2e | Serbia |
| 2020s | -4.45 Mt CO2e | -4.94 Mt CO2e | 0.4813 Mt CO2e | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Ireland or Serbia?
- Ireland, at -4.49 Mt CO2e against -4.74 Mt CO2e in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Ireland and Serbia?
- 0.25 Mt CO2e, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Serbia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Serbia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Ireland ranks 100th and Serbia ranks 101st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".