Liberia vs Norway: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Liberia
-21.47 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Norway
-20.77 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Liberia rank
138th
Norway rank
136th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Liberia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports -20.77 Mt CO2e against -21.47 Mt CO2e in Liberia, a difference of 0.7 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Liberia ahead.
Liberia ranks 138th and Norway ranks 136th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -21.47 Mt CO2e | -27.29 Mt CO2e | 5.82 Mt CO2e | Liberia |
| 2010s | -21.47 Mt CO2e | -24.27 Mt CO2e | 2.8 Mt CO2e | Liberia |
| 2020s | -21.47 Mt CO2e | -18.09 Mt CO2e | 3.38 Mt CO2e | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Liberia or Norway?
- Norway, at -20.77 Mt CO2e against -21.47 Mt CO2e in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Liberia and Norway?
- 0.7 Mt CO2e, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Norway rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Liberia ranks 138th and Norway ranks 136th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".