Malawi vs Sri Lanka: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Malawi
-2.63 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Sri Lanka
-2.83 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Malawi rank
88th
Sri Lanka rank
91st
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Malawi
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Malawi currently reports -2.63 Mt CO2e against -2.83 Mt CO2e in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.2 Mt CO2e.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 88th and Sri Lanka ranks 91st of 183 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -2.63 Mt CO2e | -5 Mt CO2e | 2.38 Mt CO2e | Malawi |
| 2010s | -2.63 Mt CO2e | -2.83 Mt CO2e | 0.2049 Mt CO2e | Malawi |
| 2020s | -2.63 Mt CO2e | -2.83 Mt CO2e | 0.2049 Mt CO2e | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Malawi or Sri Lanka?
- Malawi, at -2.63 Mt CO2e against -2.83 Mt CO2e in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Malawi and Sri Lanka?
- 0.2 Mt CO2e, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sri Lanka?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Sri Lanka rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Malawi ranks 88th and Sri Lanka ranks 91st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".