Panama vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Panama
-35.78 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Sweden
-40.92 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Panama rank
150th
Sweden rank
152nd
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Panama
- Sweden
How they compare
Panama currently reports -35.78 Mt CO2e against -40.92 Mt CO2e in Sweden, a difference of 5.14 Mt CO2e.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 150th and Sweden ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -28.25 Mt CO2e | -65 Mt CO2e | 36.75 Mt CO2e | Panama |
| 2010s | -30.77 Mt CO2e | -59.02 Mt CO2e | 28.25 Mt CO2e | Panama |
| 2020s | -35.33 Mt CO2e | -41.5 Mt CO2e | 6.18 Mt CO2e | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Panama or Sweden?
- Panama, at -35.78 Mt CO2e against -40.92 Mt CO2e in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Panama and Sweden?
- 5.14 Mt CO2e, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Sweden rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Panama ranks 150th and Sweden ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".