Serbia vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Serbia
-4.74 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Uzbekistan
-5.01 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Serbia rank
101st
Uzbekistan rank
103rd
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Serbia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports -4.74 Mt CO2e against -5.01 Mt CO2e in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.27 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 101st and Uzbekistan ranks 103rd of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -6.63 Mt CO2e | -9.83 Mt CO2e | 3.2 Mt CO2e | Serbia |
| 2010s | -5.52 Mt CO2e | -7.31 Mt CO2e | 1.79 Mt CO2e | Serbia |
| 2020s | -4.94 Mt CO2e | -4.68 Mt CO2e | 0.2513 Mt CO2e | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Serbia or Uzbekistan?
- Serbia, at -4.74 Mt CO2e against -5.01 Mt CO2e in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Serbia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.27 Mt CO2e, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uzbekistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Uzbekistan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Serbia ranks 101st and Uzbekistan ranks 103rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".