Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land

Singapore
-0.0735 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-0.137 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Singapore rank
38th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
41st

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time

  • Singapore
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-0.14-0.12-0.1-0.08200020112023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports -0.0735 Mt CO2e against -0.137 Mt CO2e in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0635 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 38th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 183 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s -0.0896 Mt CO2e -0.137 Mt CO2e 0.0474 Mt CO2e Singapore
2010s -0.0872 Mt CO2e -0.137 Mt CO2e 0.0498 Mt CO2e Singapore
2020s -0.0749 Mt CO2e -0.137 Mt CO2e 0.0621 Mt CO2e Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Singapore or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Singapore, at -0.0735 Mt CO2e against -0.137 Mt CO2e in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0635 Mt CO2e, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
Singapore ranks 38th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-forest-land-mt-co2e/singapore/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-forest-land-mt-co2e/singapore/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,518 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".