South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
South Sudan
-25.34 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-28.05 Mt CO2e
in 2023
South Sudan rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
146th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports -25.34 Mt CO2e against -28.05 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.71 Mt CO2e.
Across all 24 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 183 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -25.34 Mt CO2e | -34.8 Mt CO2e | 9.46 Mt CO2e | South Sudan |
| 2010s | -25.34 Mt CO2e | -28.05 Mt CO2e | 2.71 Mt CO2e | South Sudan |
| 2020s | -25.34 Mt CO2e | -28.05 Mt CO2e | 2.71 Mt CO2e | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- South Sudan, at -25.34 Mt CO2e against -28.05 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 2.71 Mt CO2e, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- South Sudan ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".