Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land
Sri Lanka
-2.83 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Tunisia
-3.69 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
91st
Tunisia rank
93rd
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports -2.83 Mt CO2e against -3.69 Mt CO2e in Tunisia, a difference of 0.86 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 91st and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5 Mt CO2e | -3.26 Mt CO2e | 1.74 Mt CO2e | Tunisia |
| 2010s | -2.83 Mt CO2e | -3.6 Mt CO2e | 0.7703 Mt CO2e | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | -2.83 Mt CO2e | -3.69 Mt CO2e | 0.8538 Mt CO2e | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Sri Lanka, at -2.83 Mt CO2e against -3.69 Mt CO2e in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 0.86 Mt CO2e, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - forest land?
- Sri Lanka ranks 91st and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Forest land".