Belarus vs East Asia & Pacific: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil

Belarus
14.71 Mt CO2e
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific
535.94 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Belarus rank
7th
East Asia & Pacific rank
7th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil over time

  • Belarus
  • East Asia & Pacific
0200400600800200020112023

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific currently reports 535.94 Mt CO2e against 14.71 Mt CO2e in Belarus, a difference of 521.23 Mt CO2e.

That makes East Asia & Pacific's figure about 36.4 times Belarus's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 7th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 7th of 184 countries.

East Asia & Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus East Asia & Pacific Difference Ahead
2000s 19.95 Mt CO2e 549.48 Mt CO2e 529.53 Mt CO2e East Asia & Pacific
2010s 18.89 Mt CO2e 608.34 Mt CO2e 589.45 Mt CO2e East Asia & Pacific
2020s 15.62 Mt CO2e 535.43 Mt CO2e 519.82 Mt CO2e East Asia & Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil, Belarus or East Asia & Pacific?
East Asia & Pacific, at 535.94 Mt CO2e against 14.71 Mt CO2e in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil between Belarus and East Asia & Pacific?
521.23 Mt CO2e, with East Asia & Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and East Asia & Pacific?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and East Asia & Pacific rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil?
Belarus ranks 7th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 7th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs East Asia & Pacific: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-organic-soil-mt-co2e/belarus/east-asia-and-pacific/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-organic-soil-mt-co2e/belarus/east-asia-and-pacific/">Belarus vs East Asia & Pacific: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
231 places, 5,108 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Organic soil".