Congo vs Namibia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil
Congo
0 Mt CO2e
in 2020
Namibia
0 Mt CO2e
in 2020
Congo rank
38th
Namibia rank
38th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil over time
- Congo
- Namibia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 Mt CO2e against 0 Mt CO2e in Namibia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 38th and Namibia ranks 38th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | — |
| 2010s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | — |
| 2020s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil, Congo or Namibia?
- Congo, at 0 Mt CO2e against 0 Mt CO2e in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil between Congo and Namibia?
- 0 Mt CO2e, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil?
- Congo ranks 38th and Namibia ranks 38th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Organic soil".