Statizoid

IBRD only vs United States of America: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil

IBRD only
582.73 Mt CO2e
in 2023
United States of America
52.92 Mt CO2e
in 2023
IBRD only rank
3rd
United States of America rank
3rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil over time

  • IBRD only
  • United States of America
02004006008001.0k200020112023

How they compare

IBRD only currently reports 582.73 Mt CO2e against 52.92 Mt CO2e in United States of America, a difference of 529.81 Mt CO2e.

That makes IBRD only's figure about 11.0 times United States of America's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 3rd and United States of America ranks 3rd of 47 groups.

IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 596.93 Mt CO2e 49.05 Mt CO2e 547.88 Mt CO2e IBRD only
2010s 653.49 Mt CO2e 50.91 Mt CO2e 602.58 Mt CO2e IBRD only
2020s 580.53 Mt CO2e 52.56 Mt CO2e 527.96 Mt CO2e IBRD only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil, IBRD only or United States of America?
IBRD only, at 582.73 Mt CO2e against 52.92 Mt CO2e in United States of America as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil between IBRD only and United States of America?
529.81 Mt CO2e, with IBRD only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and United States of America?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and United States of America rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - organic soil?
IBRD only ranks 3rd and United States of America ranks 3rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs United States of America: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-organic-soil-mt-co2e/ibrd-only/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-organic-soil-mt-co2e/ibrd-only/united-states/">IBRD only vs United States of America: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
231 places, 5,108 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Organic soil".