Central African Republic vs Guatemala: Cattle — Amount excreted in manure (N content)

Central African Republic
199.64 million kg
in 2023
Guatemala
189.08 million kg
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
58th
Guatemala rank
60th

Cattle — Amount excreted in manure (N content) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Guatemala
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 199.64 million kg against 189.08 million kg in Guatemala, a difference of 10.56 million kg.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 58th and Guatemala ranks 60th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 19.90 million kg 58.96 million kg 39.05 million kg Guatemala
1970s 38.40 million kg 70.98 million kg 32.59 million kg Guatemala
1980s 85.87 million kg 93.51 million kg 7.63 million kg Guatemala
1990s 115.51 million kg 103.37 million kg 12.14 million kg Central African Republic
2000s 143.96 million kg 124.07 million kg 19.88 million kg Central African Republic
2010s 179.97 million kg 165.54 million kg 14.43 million kg Central African Republic
2020s 194.64 million kg 185.40 million kg 9.24 million kg Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — amount excreted in manure, Central African Republic or Guatemala?
Central African Republic, at 199.64 million kg against 189.08 million kg in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — amount excreted in manure between Central African Republic and Guatemala?
10.56 million kg, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Guatemala rank globally for cattle — amount excreted in manure?
Central African Republic ranks 58th and Guatemala ranks 60th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Amount excreted in manure (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Guatemala: Cattle — Amount excreted in manure. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/central-african-republic/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/central-african-republic/guatemala/">Central African Republic vs Guatemala: Cattle — Amount excreted in manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Amount excreted in manure (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).