India vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks

India
153.26 million LSU
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
286.37 million LSU
in 2023
India rank
3rd
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
5th

Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks over time

  • India
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 286.37 million LSU against 153.26 million LSU in India, a difference of 133.11 million LSU.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times India's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

India ranks 3rd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 114.29 million LSU 112.33 million LSU 1.96 million LSU India
1970s 119.82 million LSU 128.32 million LSU 8.49 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1980s 134.31 million LSU 141.92 million LSU 7.61 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1990s 143.89 million LSU 161.34 million LSU 17.45 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 146.44 million LSU 197.96 million LSU 51.51 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 150.06 million LSU 249.26 million LSU 99.20 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 152.73 million LSU 280.24 million LSU 127.51 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle and buffaloes — stocks, India or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 286.37 million LSU against 153.26 million LSU in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle and buffaloes — stocks between India and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
133.11 million LSU, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do India and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for cattle and buffaloes — stocks?
India ranks 3rd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,793 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.