Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Pakistan: Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
286.37 million LSU
in 2023
Pakistan
50.21 million LSU
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
5th
Pakistan rank
7th

Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Pakistan
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 286.37 million LSU against 50.21 million LSU in Pakistan, a difference of 236.16 million LSU.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 5.7 times Pakistan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 35 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 112.33 million LSU 11.13 million LSU 101.20 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1970s 128.32 million LSU 12.54 million LSU 115.77 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1980s 141.92 million LSU 15.27 million LSU 126.64 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1990s 161.34 million LSU 19.31 million LSU 142.03 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 197.96 million LSU 26.23 million LSU 171.72 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 249.26 million LSU 37.89 million LSU 211.37 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 280.24 million LSU 47.78 million LSU 232.46 million LSU Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle and buffaloes — stocks, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Pakistan?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 286.37 million LSU against 50.21 million LSU in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle and buffaloes — stocks between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Pakistan?
236.16 million LSU, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for cattle and buffaloes — stocks?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,793 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.