Canada vs Oceania: Cattle, dairy β€” Losses from manure treated

Canada
34.54 million kg
in 2023
Oceania
70.50 million kg
in 2023
Canada rank
21st
Oceania rank
23rd

Cattle, dairy β€” Losses from manure treated over time

  • Canada
  • Oceania
40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

Oceania currently reports 70.50 million kg against 34.54 million kg in Canada, a difference of 35.96 million kg.

That makes Oceania's figure about 2.0 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 21st and Oceania ranks 23rd of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Oceania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Oceania Difference Ahead
1960s 100.27 million kg 59.46 million kg 40.81 million kg Canada
1970s 75.14 million kg 52.50 million kg 22.64 million kg Canada
1980s 57.77 million kg 49.82 million kg 7.95 million kg Canada
1990s 44.71 million kg 57.38 million kg 12.68 million kg Oceania
2000s 37.27 million kg 69.86 million kg 32.59 million kg Oceania
2010s 34.36 million kg 77.12 million kg 42.76 million kg Oceania
2020s 34.82 million kg 71.53 million kg 36.71 million kg Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, dairy β€” losses from manure treated, Canada or Oceania?
Oceania, at 70.50 million kg against 34.54 million kg in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, dairy β€” losses from manure treated between Canada and Oceania?
35.96 million kg, with Oceania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Oceania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Oceania rank globally for cattle, dairy β€” losses from manure treated?
Canada ranks 21st and Oceania ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, dairy β€” Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Oceania: Cattle, dairy β€” Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/canada/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/canada/oceania/">Canada vs Oceania: Cattle, dairy β€” Losses from manure treated</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, dairy β€” Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).