Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Cattle, dairy — Manure management

Australia and New Zealand
120.40 million kg
in 2023
Bangladesh
86.19 million kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
20th
Bangladesh rank
23rd

Cattle, dairy — Manure management over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Bangladesh
25.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 120.40 million kg against 86.19 million kg in Bangladesh, a difference of 34.21 million kg.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Bangladesh ranks 23rd of 190 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Bangladesh Difference Ahead
1960s 101.98 million kg 24.56 million kg 77.43 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1970s 89.69 million kg 30.01 million kg 59.69 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1980s 85.12 million kg 35.86 million kg 49.26 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1990s 97.94 million kg 50.24 million kg 47.70 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 119.51 million kg 78.55 million kg 40.95 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2010s 131.99 million kg 81.77 million kg 50.22 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2020s 122.35 million kg 85.38 million kg 36.97 million kg Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, dairy — manure management, Australia and New Zealand or Bangladesh?
Australia and New Zealand, at 120.40 million kg against 86.19 million kg in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, dairy — manure management between Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh?
34.21 million kg, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh rank globally for cattle, dairy — manure management?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Bangladesh ranks 23rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Cattle, dairy — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/bangladesh/">Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Cattle, dairy — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).