China, Taiwan Province of vs Sri Lanka: Cattle, dairy — Manure management

China, Taiwan Province of
2.89 million kg
in 2023
Sri Lanka
3.40 million kg
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
109th
Sri Lanka rank
108th

Cattle, dairy — Manure management over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Sri Lanka
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 3.40 million kg against 2.89 million kg in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 508,720 kg.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times China, Taiwan Province of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 108th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 235,592 kg 2.96 million kg 2.73 million kg Sri Lanka
1970s 838,290 kg 2.66 million kg 1.82 million kg Sri Lanka
1980s 2.30 million kg 2.71 million kg 412,436 kg Sri Lanka
1990s 3.76 million kg 3.12 million kg 641,133 kg China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 2.57 million kg 2.22 million kg 354,040 kg China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 2.58 million kg 2.89 million kg 305,797 kg Sri Lanka
2020s 2.83 million kg 3.42 million kg 590,058 kg Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, dairy — manure management, China, Taiwan Province of or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 3.40 million kg against 2.89 million kg in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, dairy — manure management between China, Taiwan Province of and Sri Lanka?
508,720 kg, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Sri Lanka rank globally for cattle, dairy — manure management?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 108th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Sri Lanka: Cattle, dairy — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-taiwan-province-of/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-dairy-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-taiwan-province-of/sri-lanka/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Sri Lanka: Cattle, dairy — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, dairy — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).