Argentina vs Dominican Republic: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Argentina
-1.11 % change on previous year
in 2023
Dominican Republic
-1.04 % change on previous year
in 2023
Argentina rank
141st
Dominican Republic rank
139th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Argentina
  • Dominican Republic
-40-20020196219922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports -1.04 % change on previous year against -1.11 % change on previous year in Argentina, a difference of 0.07 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Argentina ranks 141st and Dominican Republic ranks 139th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Dominican Republic in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8218 % change on previous year 0.5036 % change on previous year 0.3182 % change on previous year Argentina
1970s 2.2 % change on previous year 2.12 % change on previous year 0.0828 % change on previous year Argentina
1980s -1.06 % change on previous year -1.73 % change on previous year 0.6691 % change on previous year Argentina
1990s -0.2686 % change on previous year 4.59 % change on previous year 4.85 % change on previous year Dominican Republic
2000s -1.56 % change on previous year 4.4 % change on previous year 5.96 % change on previous year Dominican Republic
2010s -2.36 % change on previous year 4.02 % change on previous year 6.38 % change on previous year Dominican Republic
2020s -1.06 % change on previous year -0.9874 % change on previous year 0.0737 % change on previous year Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Argentina or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at -1.04 % change on previous year against -1.11 % change on previous year in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Argentina and Dominican Republic?
0.07 % change on previous year, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Dominican Republic?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Dominican Republic rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Argentina ranks 141st and Dominican Republic ranks 139th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Dominican Republic: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/argentina/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/argentina/dominican-republic/">Argentina vs Dominican Republic: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.