Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Belarus
-0.2793 % change on previous year
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
-0.1383 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belarus rank
119th
Papua New Guinea rank
116th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Belarus
  • Papua New Guinea
-1001020196219922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports -0.1383 % change on previous year against -0.2793 % change on previous year in Belarus, a difference of 0.141 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Belarus ranks 119th and Papua New Guinea ranks 116th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s -3.99 % change on previous year -1.51 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2000s -1.65 % change on previous year 0.9716 % change on previous year 2.62 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.3707 % change on previous year -0.2783 % change on previous year 0.649 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s -0.6483 % change on previous year -0.0825 % change on previous year 0.5658 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Belarus or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at -0.1383 % change on previous year against -0.2793 % change on previous year in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Belarus and Papua New Guinea?
0.141 % change on previous year, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Papua New Guinea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Papua New Guinea rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Belarus ranks 119th and Papua New Guinea ranks 116th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/belarus/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/belarus/papua-new-guinea/">Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.