Belgium-Luxembourg vs Mozambique: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Belgium-Luxembourg
4.27 % change on previous year
in 1999
Mozambique
3.86 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
20th
Mozambique rank
21st

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Mozambique
-60-40-20020196219922023

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 4.27 % change on previous year against 3.86 % change on previous year in Mozambique, a difference of 0.41 % change on previous year.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Mozambique ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 20th and Mozambique ranks 21st of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6755 % change on previous year 3.23 % change on previous year 2.56 % change on previous year Mozambique
1970s 0.1156 % change on previous year 1.3 % change on previous year 1.19 % change on previous year Mozambique
1980s -0.3315 % change on previous year -1.46 % change on previous year 1.13 % change on previous year Belgium-Luxembourg
1990s -0.6542 % change on previous year -7.74 % change on previous year 7.09 % change on previous year Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Belgium-Luxembourg or Mozambique?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 4.27 % change on previous year against 3.86 % change on previous year in Mozambique as of 1999.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique?
0.41 % change on previous year, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique?
38 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 20th and Mozambique ranks 21st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Mozambique: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/belgium-luxembourg/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/belgium-luxembourg/mozambique/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Mozambique: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.