Costa Rica vs Faroe Islands: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Costa Rica
17.17 % change on previous year
in 2023
Faroe Islands
17.06 % change on previous year
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
4th
Faroe Islands rank
5th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Faroe Islands
-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 17.17 % change on previous year against 17.06 % change on previous year in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.11 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 4th and Faroe Islands ranks 5th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Faroe Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 5.31 % change on previous year -2.05 % change on previous year 7.36 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1970s 4.39 % change on previous year -2.68 % change on previous year 7.07 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1980s 0.3855 % change on previous year 0.6586 % change on previous year 0.2732 % change on previous year Faroe Islands
1990s 5.22 % change on previous year 1 % change on previous year 4.22 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2000s 2.72 % change on previous year -0.6169 % change on previous year 3.34 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2010s 3.08 % change on previous year -0.6796 % change on previous year 3.76 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2020s -0.3402 % change on previous year 1.09 % change on previous year 1.43 % change on previous year Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Costa Rica or Faroe Islands?
Costa Rica, at 17.17 % change on previous year against 17.06 % change on previous year in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Costa Rica and Faroe Islands?
0.11 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Faroe Islands?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Faroe Islands rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Faroe Islands ranks 5th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Faroe Islands: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/faroe-islands/">Costa Rica vs Faroe Islands: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.