Ecuador vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Ecuador
3.25 % change on previous year
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3.37 % change on previous year
in 2023
Ecuador rank
32nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
30th
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time
- Ecuador
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 3.37 % change on previous year against 3.25 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 0.12 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 28 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
Ecuador ranks 32nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 30th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.58 % change on previous year | 3.7 % change on previous year | 0.1212 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1970s | 1.65 % change on previous year | 1.45 % change on previous year | 0.199 % change on previous year | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 1.16 % change on previous year | 1.72 % change on previous year | 0.5581 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1990s | 4.28 % change on previous year | 2.01 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 1.78 % change on previous year | 4.57 % change on previous year | 2.79 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 0.1986 % change on previous year | 2.68 % change on previous year | 2.48 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2020s | -3.98 % change on previous year | 4.97 % change on previous year | 8.96 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Ecuador or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 3.37 % change on previous year against 3.25 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Ecuador and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.12 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
- Ecuador ranks 32nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 30th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.